By Kathryn Creedy
May 5, 2026, © Leeham News: Not one of the numerous studies from every aviation/aerospace policy organization has quantified the costs of not addressing our workforce shortages at an industry-wide level, although concerns are rising at the academic level. And there is little effort in developing a unified career pipeline guiding the kids we are already inspiring into our careers, as other industries have long been doing.
Only a few estimates exist on the cost of workforce shortages:
Aviation and aerospace policy groups in Washington, in their rush to convince policy leaders about the importance of their multi-billion-dollar impact on the economy, might be missing the forest for the trees in not quantifying the costs.

Raisbeck Aviation High School in Seattle is privately funded. Students study to become aerospace engineers. Credit: Raisbeck Aviation High School.
It is clear that the aviation, aerospace, and defense industries contribute billions to the economy, but two important facts are missing.
The total talent forecast for all segments of the industry and the cost of failing to meet workforce needs.
All studies cite rising compensation, higher maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) and manufacturing costs, and the costs associated with delays in returning aircraft from maintenance and in delivering new aircraft off the production line. But none quantifies how much those rising costs are.
Nor are they calculating the cost to safety, despite rising concerns over the loss of seasoned aviators and aviation maintenance technicians, and the resulting “juniority” on the flight deck and in the maintenance bay. Exacerbating our shortages is the training pipeline with a shortage of instructors, professors, and teachers.
March 1, 2021, © Leeham News: Two bills before the Washington State Legislature intend to create long-term strategic plans to grow the state’s advanced manufacturing sector in general – and the space industry in particular.
To this we say yes, hell yes and amen.
North America’s largest aerospace cluster has lurched from crisis to crisis over the past 20 years, with elected officials scrambling to meet Boeing’s demands for tax, workforce and labor concessions.
And – much to our dismay – for most of the past two decades, leadership in the state Capitol of Olympia has been content to cobble together ad hoc responses with only the faintest lip service toward any kind of long-range strategic planning for future industry needs.
These bills – Substitute House Bill 1170 and Substitute House Bill 1190 – have the potential to change all of that.
danieljcatchpole[at]gmail[dot]com
This article has been updated to correct an error that misstated the relative size of New Glenn’s payload.
October 11, 2018, © Leeham News: Wednesday’s announcement that the U.S. Air Force had selected Blue Origin along with Northrop Grumman and United Launch Alliance to develop launch system prototypes was welcomed news for the Jeff Bezos-backed company. The Air Force has committed about $500 million through 2024 for Blue Origin’s contract to develop its New Glenn rocket, which will be able to haul 50-ton payloads to low Earth orbit and 13-ton loads to geosynchronous orbit.
Nonetheless, the company’s “entire fundamental business model is based around commercial launches,” Blue Origin CEO Bob Smith said at the Aerospace Futures Alliance’s annual summit in Lynnwood, WA.
Smith said New Glenn is expected to launch in 2021. As recently as this summer, company executives had said first launch is slated for late 2020.