Leeham News and Analysis
There's more to real news than a news release.
Leeham News and Analysis
- The Boeing 767 Cross Section, Part 1 November 24, 2022
- Movie Review: Devotion November 21, 2022
- China will accelerate development of its commercial aerospace sector November 21, 2022
- Bjorn’s Corner: Sustainable Air Transport. Part 46. eVTOL comparison with helicopter November 18, 2022
- The economics of a 787-9 and A330-900 at eight or nine abreast November 16, 2022
Pontifications: Taking a knife to a gunfight
April 27, 2020, © Leeham News: There is a great line in the movie, The Untouchables. Sean Connery’s character tells an assassin that he’s bringing a knife to a gunfight.
By Scott Hamilton
That’s what came to mind when Embraer says it will seek remedies against Boeing following the latter’s terminating the joint venture agreement between the two companies.
In the movie, the assassin lured Connery into a trap. Connery was gunned down by a machine gun. But don’t expect Boeing to be lured into any trap by Embraer.
Boeing doesn’t pull a move like this without thinking through all the possibilities. It may muff the thought process, as will be noted below, but it does think through alternatives.
Analysis: The collapse of the Boeing-Embraer joint venture
By the Leeham News Team
Analysis
April 25, 2020, © Leeham News: The Boeing-Embraer joint venture is off.
Boeing called off the JV, saying Embraer didn’t satisfy all the conditions required.
The Boeing-Embraer joint venture is dead.
The impact to Embraer is more profound than to Boeing.
When the JV was announced in 2019, the advantages for Boeing were:
- Access to EMB engineers at a time when Boeing’s are aging and ready to retire.
- Access to much lower cost base in Brazil.
- KC-390 program.
- Revenue from EMB Commercial services.
- E2 program, though this is tangential.
The advantages for Embraer were:
- Access to Boeing’s vast customer base, marketing power, balance sheet (again, pre-virus) and capital markets.
- Access to work on new airplane programs: NMA (at the time), Future Small Airplanes (single aisle, either to compete with A220 or larger).
- Work for its engineers.
- A future beyond the struggling E2 and beyond the fanciful turboprop concept.
- A future for Embraer Commercial Airplanes, which in LNA’s view was increasingly risky.
Can a passenger airliner run as a freighter with today’s tariffs? Part 4.
By Bjorn Fehrm
Subscription Required
Introduction
April 23, 2020, © Leeham News: We spent the last weeks checking if passenger airliners used as belly freighters make economic sense.
With the present air freight prices, it does. The high freight prices are a result of half the World’s freight capacity disappearing with the grounding of passenger jets.
Our economic analysis assumed standard densities for the belly cargo. What happens if this is no longer the case? Can more voluminous cargo fly in the passenger cabin?
Figure 1. Air Canada Boeing 777 with humanitarian supplies (face masks) transported in the cabin. Source: Air Canada.
Summary:
- Widebody aircraft can temporarily fly as belly freighters without loading cargo in the cabin, but enabling cabin cargo will improve the business case with the present lower-density cargo.
- For single-aisle jets the belly cargo holds are too small, a cabin cargo loading system is necessary for efficient operation.
- Is it OK to take out the seats and load cargo in the cabin? For normal cargo no, it isn’t. We check what is required.
Supply chain focus: Hexcel’s first 2020 quarter
By Bjorn Fehrm
April 22, 2020, ©. Leeham News: With the COVID-19 meltdown of airline traffic and aircraft deliveries, we place a special focus on the airliner industry supply chain in the next months.
Hexcel Corporation reported its 1Q2020 yesterday. In addition to the absence of MAX deliveries for a year, the mounting COVID crisis meant revenue was down with 11% year on year and profits 40%. The merger with Woodward Inc. is off. “This is the time for crisis management, not a merger,” said management.
Hexcel is a key supplier to Airbus A350.
Read more
Is COVID-19 a Force Majeure event?
Editor’s Note: Airbus, Boeing and Embraer and other OEMs face requests for deferrals and perhaps cancellations of orders as a result of COVID-19. In addition, Boeing now faces cancellation requests for the 737 MAX grounding, now in its 13th month. While Boeing’s contracts generally allow Boeing or the customer to cancel the order after the 12th month, the COVID crisis raises a new element: canceling by Force Majeure and something called the Doctrine of Frustration.
The following analysis appeared March 12, 2020, on the website of the law firm Shearman & Sterling law firm. The authors are listed at the end of this article. It is reprinted here with permission.
Following the rapid spread of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) that was first reported in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic on March 11, 2020.
In this note, we consider how force majeure provisions in commercial contracts and the related common law doctrine of frustration may be engaged in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak. While this analysis focuses primarily on the position under English law, we have included a PRC law perspective because of the significant impact COVID-19 has had on business in China. We also suggest steps that parties may take to safeguard their positions in view of the evolving situation.
Pontifications: Assessing the impact of COVID-19: today’s take
By Scott Hamilton
April 6, 2020, © Leeham News: It’s going to be quite a while before there is a clear understanding how coronavirus will change commercial aviation.
LNA already touched on impacts to Airbus, Boeing and Embraer. None of it is good. For Boeing, burdened with the additional stress of the 737 MAX, is in the worst position. Even when the MAX is recertified, there won’t be many—or any—customers in a position to take delivery of the airplane.
Bearing in mind that what’s true today will change in a day, or even an hour, let’s take a rundown of where things seem to stand now.
Engine maker, lessor see Boeing’s next airplane as a single-aisle design
Subscription Required
Now open to all readers.
By Scott Hamilton
“The NMA is gone. Long live the NMA.”–lessor CEO. Photo: Leeham Co.
April 2, 2020, © Leeham News: Boeing’s New Midmarket Airplane, or a new concept, is the last thing on the plate right now.
But Boeing’s future product strategy nevertheless requires long-term thinking even as the short- to medium-term is in chaos.
Interviews were conducted March 2 at a major aerospace conference in Austin (TX), just days before the coronavirus crisis exploded exponentially across the globe.
The CEO of the major lessor, Avolon, declared the NMA dead and predicted a new single-aisle airplane will be Boeing’s next project.
An executive of Pratt & Whitney offered a similar view.
Summary
- “The NMA is gone. Long live the NMA. That moment has passed.
- Back to the 757 replacement concept and, now, A321XLR competitor.
- Single-aisle vs light twin-aisle is part of the challenge.
- New airplane must be “dramatically” more efficient than MAX, neo.
- 2030 decade is the quickest this dramatic improvement can be achieved.
Pontifications: Critical step in Boeing MAX recertification target: May
By Scott Hamilton
March 30, 2020, © Leeham News: Barring further issues, the FAA Type Inspection Authorization for the MAX is targeted for the second half of May, LNA learned.
This is a critical step in recertifying the airplane.
Also barring more unexpected events in a year filled with them, Boeing should resume production of the 737 MAX in May, LNA confirmed.
Boeing has $15bn in liquidity and can survive in short term; credit markets need to reopen
By Scott Hamilton
Boeing CEO David Calhoun. Source: CNBC.
March 24, 2020, © Leeham News: Boeing CEO David Calhoun said the company has $15bn in liquidity and can survive in the short term, but federal aid is needed as long as the credit markets aren’t open.
The US Defense Department is working to accelerate payments to Boeing, which has a large defense business. Revenue at Boeing Global Services is down as airlines across the globe shut down or sharply reduced operations.
Calhoun made his remark on CNBC’s Squawk Box today.
Coronavirus upends Airbus, Embraer in addition to Boeing woes
Subscription Required
By Scott Hamilton
Introduction
March 23, 2020, © Leeham News: The dramatically and continuously worsening impact of coronavirus worldwide is upending Boeing—more than it has been—and Airbus.
Boeing is considering shutting the wide-body production lines, The Seattle Times reported. It also wants US government aid.
Source: CDC.
Airbus shut its assembly lines in France and Spain for four days in response to federal restrictions.
LNA previously wrote about the impact it sees on Boeing and, to a degree, on Airbus.
These analyses are updated to the latest circumstances.
We also add a look at Embraer delivery stream for March-December.
Summary
- Even if Boeing recertifies the 737 MAX by mid-year, deliveries now in doubt.
- Customers can cancel MAXes without penalty.
- Airbus faces massive deferrals under the circumstances. Penalties apply.
- Embraer’s customer concentration is in USA.